<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prolink PML095G vs Microsoft Wireless Notebook Optical Mouse 4000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/computing/04/prolink-pml095g-vs-microsoft-wireless-notebook-optical-mouse-4000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/computing/04/prolink-pml095g-vs-microsoft-wireless-notebook-optical-mouse-4000/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: merc</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/computing/04/prolink-pml095g-vs-microsoft-wireless-notebook-optical-mouse-4000/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>merc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/?p=50#comment-142</guid>
		<description>yeah... the Microsoft Optical Mouse 4000 would not work on glass surface, but tis pretty consistent over not so reflective surface. But in my case its far more stable then the PML095G... hm... this is weired...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230; the Microsoft Optical Mouse 4000 would not work on glass surface, but tis pretty consistent over not so reflective surface. But in my case its far more stable then the PML095G&#8230; hm&#8230; this is weired&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PML095G mouse user</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/computing/04/prolink-pml095g-vs-microsoft-wireless-notebook-optical-mouse-4000/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>PML095G mouse user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/?p=50#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I have quite the opposite experience with this  Prolink mouse. I normally stick with branded mice (MS, Logitech etc.), therefore last time when I went shopping for a good portable mouse for my notebook I ended up buying a Microsoft Notebook Laser Mouse 6000;  the worst mouse I ever owned !. It behaved exactly like your Prolink. Only works on completely black mousepads. (jumps all over the screen if used on a surface with light colors or patterns). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I saw this cheap Prolink mouse few days back when I was looking for a cheap wireless keyboard mouse combo for my desktop server;  Didnt worry too much about the brand  because I dont use the desktop very often. However, to my surprise this Prolink turned out to be much better than the more expensive MS 6000!  Now I use it as the primary mouse with the notebook. Even though it may not be as accurate or as sensitive as some of the high-end optical mice out there, it is still very usable for normal work, has better precision and range than the MS Notebook 6000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have quite the opposite experience with this  Prolink mouse. I normally stick with branded mice (MS, Logitech etc.), therefore last time when I went shopping for a good portable mouse for my notebook I ended up buying a Microsoft Notebook Laser Mouse 6000;  the worst mouse I ever owned !. It behaved exactly like your Prolink. Only works on completely black mousepads. (jumps all over the screen if used on a surface with light colors or patterns). </p>
<p>Then I saw this cheap Prolink mouse few days back when I was looking for a cheap wireless keyboard mouse combo for my desktop server;  Didnt worry too much about the brand  because I dont use the desktop very often. However, to my surprise this Prolink turned out to be much better than the more expensive MS 6000!  Now I use it as the primary mouse with the notebook. Even though it may not be as accurate or as sensitive as some of the high-end optical mice out there, it is still very usable for normal work, has better precision and range than the MS Notebook 6000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/computing/04/prolink-pml095g-vs-microsoft-wireless-notebook-optical-mouse-4000/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 10:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamcubes.com/b2/?p=50#comment-140</guid>
		<description>That the price to pay for lol. Agree get a reputable brand that has credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the price to pay for lol. Agree get a reputable brand that has credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

